Pi Leo Academy · Year 4 English

Literature

77 questions and practical tasks · Victorian Curriculum English Version 2.0 · Level 4 · VC2E4LE02

Questions with a separate answer key and review guidance.

Circle one option for multiple-choice questions. Use the response spaces or extra paper for longer work.

Name: ________________________________   Date: __________________

Answers and review guidance

Open responses, handwriting and spoken tasks need adult review. The models are examples; different responses may meet the criteria.

Question 1

Answer: The clock moves towards the train's six o'clock departure.

The approaching departure makes every delay matter and creates plot tension.

Question 2

Answer: To suggest Niko is worried and checking the same place again.

Rechecking a place already searched reveals urgency through action.

Question 3

Answer: It delays the explanation and makes the reader wonder what caused the sound.

The unknown source briefly increases suspense before the sister appears.

Question 4

Answer: Niko spent three evenings carving a gift for his grandmother.

His effort and intended recipient give the parcel emotional value.

Question 5

Answer: It resolves the problem of the missing key.

She has the key, so the obstacle to leaving is removed.

Question 6

Answer: They reached the platform as their grandmother waved from the doorway.

This continues the established goal and lets the gift reach its intended audience.

Question 7

Answer: She moves from competing alone to valuing cooperation.

“Mine” at the start contrasts with “Our” on the final label.

Question 8

Answer: “Mine” and “Our”.

The pronouns shift the project from individual ownership to shared work.

Question 9

Answer: She is disappointed and speaks quietly.

Her failed bridge and the quiet speaking verb support disappointment.

Question 10

Answer: He suggests combining the strengths of both designs.

He notices a useful part of Suri's attempt and invites a shared improvement.

Question 11

Answer: It suggests both teamwork and more experimenting ahead.

“Our” signals cooperation and “first” leaves room for further designs.

Question 12

Answer: Combining ideas can improve a result.

The strongest bridge uses a contribution from each child.

Question 13

Answer: Why Eli stays near the doorway.

She suspects boredom, while Eli's account reveals a need for quiet.

Question 14

Answer: The noise is tiring after a crowded journey.

His passage describes lingering train noise and difficulty thinking beside the game.

Question 15

Answer: Both cousins have good intentions, but they misread the situation.

Poppy prepares games to welcome him; Eli wants to thank her but needs a pause.

Question 16

Answer: First-person words such as “I” and “my”.

Each narrator tells their own thoughts and perceptions directly.

Question 17

Answer: Poppy asks how Eli is feeling and they sit quietly before choosing a game.

A conversation can correct the misunderstanding and allow both needs to be met.

Question 18

Answer: Readers would have less direct evidence of Eli's reason for waiting.

Eli's own narration supplies information Poppy does not yet have.

Question 19

Answer: The shelf speaks about being tickled.

Giving a shelf speech and sensation moves beyond an ordinary library setting.

Question 20

Answer: It makes the strange situation gently humorous.

The comparison with borrowers treats an impossible talking shelf as if it were an everyday library user.

Question 21

Answer: The boat sound hints at a possible ending for Ada's unfinished story.

A boat could solve the stranded sailor's problem, linking the two pieces of information.

Question 22

Answer: It treats missing story endings as things that might be stored in a room.

This unusual idea raises a question the reader wants answered.

Question 23

Answer: She checks that the librarian is still nearby.

The familiar adult anchors the fantasy in an everyday setting.

Question 24

Answer: A paper boat drifted out, carrying the sailor's missing final sentence.

It develops the existing links among books, a boat and the unfinished story.

Question 25

Answer: “Rain tries the roof with a fingertip.”

Rain is imagined as a person testing the roof with a finger.

Question 26

Answer: The rhythmic sound and shining appearance of rainwater.

The metaphor connects sound with a bright visual image rather than a literal drum.

Question 27

Answer: Gentle tapping grows stronger, then becomes quiet.

The sequence moves from “tick” through “tum” to “hush”.

Question 28

Answer: It gives the lines a repeated beat like raindrops.

“Tick, tick”, “Tap, tap” and “Hush, hush” set up patterns the reader can hear.

Question 29

Answer: “tip” and “fingertip”.

The line endings share the same final stressed sound.

Question 30

Answer: The storm is ending like a performer leaving after a show.

The personification extends the idea of the weather as a musical performance.

Question 31

Answer: A lost glove on a fence.

The opening directly identifies one glove on a fence.

Question 32

Answer: A person trying to attract attention.

The glove takes on the human action of waving to passers-by.

Question 33

Answer: To show the change from being worn to being left behind.

The glove once held a hand and now contains only its shape and rain.

Question 34

Answer: The speaker imagines helping the glove find its owner.

The small, gentle action suggests care; it need not be a literal belief that the glove walks.

Question 35

Answer: They encourage attention to small details and pauses.

The slow unfolding gives weight to the glove, the empty shape and the rain.

Question 36

Answer: The glove feels a little lonely because it is separated from its hand.

The contrast between a hand yesterday and an empty shape today supports that emotional response.

Question 37

Answer: Actions and setting information for a performance.

Stage directions show movement, expression and the physical setting.

Question 38

Answer: The third chair may block access to the display.

Ben points out that the suggested position prevents people reaching the model.

Question 39

Answer: By suggesting a different arrangement of the table.

Moving the table makes room for both the chair and a path.

Question 40

Answer: Whether the arrangement lets people see the model.

Her next line confirms that everyone can see after the rearrangement.

Question 41

Answer: A bridge is about access, but their display almost blocked access.

The remark links the purpose of the model with the problem they have just solved.

Question 42

Answer: The movement of chairs and the table makes the problem visible.

The stage directions let an audience see how the space changes.

Question 43

Answer: Non-human things speak or think like people.

The lantern boasts, the candle speaks and the seed feels envy.

Question 44

Answer: Boasting can overlook an important weakness.

The lantern focuses on brightness but fails because of its loose door.

Question 45

Answer: Different things have different strengths and develop in different ways.

The ending explicitly recognises that neither can do everything the other can.

Question 46

Answer: A gives spoken advice; B offers a balanced observation.

The candle states a lesson, whereas Tale B's narrator compares capabilities.

Question 47

Answer: Its door is loose when the wind rises.

The weak door allows the wind to extinguish the flame.

Question 48

Answer: They are newly written classroom tales, not attributed cultural or traditional stories.

The label explains their source and avoids suggesting they come from an unnamed tradition.

Question 49

Example response / review guidance: The six o'clock departure creates a deadline. “Something rattled” withholds the source of a sound, making readers wait for an explanation.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Names two specific details.
  • Explains each detail's effect.
  • Connects the effects to suspense.

Question 50

Example response / review guidance: I think it is effective because Suri begins by saying “Mine” but ends with “Our first design”. The label shows that she has learned to cooperate.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • States an opinion.
  • Links an earlier detail to the ending.
  • Explains the effect on the reader.

Question 51

Example response / review guidance: At first I might think Eli dislikes the games, as Poppy fears. His description of the noisy train shows that he needs quiet, so I understand that she has misread his silence.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Uses details from both accounts.
  • Explains a change in understanding.
  • Avoids claiming either cousin is deliberately unkind.

Question 52

Example response / review guidance: The atlas and nearby librarian are familiar library details. A talking shelf and a room of lost story endings introduce fantasy into that familiar world.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Identifies ordinary features.
  • Identifies fantasy features.
  • Explains the effect of combining them.

Question 53

Example response / review guidance: “Today it holds the shape of a hand” feels lonely to me because the glove is empty where a person's hand used to be.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Selects a specific image.
  • Names a response or feeling.
  • Explains how the language creates it.

Question 54

Example response / review guidance: Luc moving the table shows how the blocked path can be opened. Without seeing that movement, the audience might not understand why Ben can carry the chair around.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Selects a stage direction.
  • Explains its contribution to meaning.
  • Considers its absence.

Question 55

Example response / review guidance: Both encourage readers to look beyond an obvious strength. The lantern overlooks protection and fails, while the seed discovers that slow growth gives it different strengths from a paper flower.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • States a supported similarity.
  • States a supported difference.
  • Uses an event from each original tale.

Question 56

Example response / review guidance: “Six O'Clock” highlights the deadline without revealing who has the key, so a reader wonders whether Niko will make it.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Suggests a relevant title.
  • Keeps the solution unrevealed.
  • Explains a likely effect on a reader.

Question 57

Example response / review guidance: A close view of the glove with an empty path behind it could emphasise the absent owner. Leaving space beside the glove could make it seem isolated.

The model is an example, not the only valid response. Review how well the chosen evidence or original writing meets the stated criteria.

Review criteria
  • Describes a relevant composition.
  • Links a visual choice to the poem.
  • Explains its effect.

Question 58

Example response / review guidance: A useful response names each character and selects an event from each book, then explains a shared idea such as exploring or returning and a difference in the circumstances.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 59

Example response / review guidance: Identify the two relationships, explain how each is shown through action or words, and compare them without assuming all animal stories have the same message.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 60

Example response / review guidance: Refer to one visible feature and one relevant word choice in each book. Explain how their effects are similar or different.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 61

Example response / review guidance: Name a shared idea that the books actually support, give an event from each, and explain why the different treatments affect you differently.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 62

Example response / review guidance: Discuss evidence from the two particular books. A similarity about belonging or place must be supported by details, and a difference should preserve each book's context.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 63

Example response / review guidance: Name the relationship in each book and explain an action, memory or exchange that shows it. Then make a clear connection between the two.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 64

Example response / review guidance: Describe what each opening presents, explain a language or illustration choice, and compare the expectations those choices create.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 65

Example response / review guidance: Use the titles and authors, support the comparison with a detail from each, and explain what reading both adds. Avoid suggesting one book represents every person's experience.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 66

Example response / review guidance: Choose an idea genuinely supported by both texts. Explain a specific incident from each and how the settings or circumstances make the experiences distinct.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 67

Example response / review guidance: Select a memory or narrated event in each. Explain the relevant family, place or time details and connect them to its significance.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 68

Example response / review guidance: Describe each moment accurately, identify a language or visual choice, and explain its effect before comparing the two.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 69

Example response / review guidance: Support any suggested similarity with actions or words from both books; then explain a real difference in circumstances or outcome.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 70

Example response / review guidance: Use named features or events from each text, connect them to a shared idea and explain a distinction in the places or perspectives.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 71

Example response / review guidance: Identify the viewpoint in each book from the words, compare what it emphasises, and support the comparison with specific details.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 72

Example response / review guidance: Describe a feature of each chosen illustration, connect it to its accompanying text and explain a similarity or difference in effect.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 73

Example response / review guidance: State an evidence-based connection, name the titles and creators, and explain why both belong in that discussion without calling their contexts interchangeable.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 74

Example response / review guidance: Select a journey actually described in each book. Support the comparison with events and preserve the different historical and personal circumstances.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 75

Example response / review guidance: Explain what each selected detail makes visible or understandable, then compare the effects. Personal responses may differ when grounded in evidence.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 76

Example response / review guidance: Describe the relationship or connection using events in each text; explain a supported similarity and a contextual difference.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.

Question 77

Example response / review guidance: Name a supported shared idea, such as facing change, use evidence from both books, and explain why the particular lives and contexts must remain distinct.

This task assesses a response to the actual published books. There is no single fixed interpretation: a teacher or adult should check the cited events, comparisons and reasoning against the books.

Review criteria
  • Refers accurately to both named books and their creators.
  • Uses a specific event, word choice or illustration detail from each book.
  • Explains a meaningful connection and respects differences of context.