Pi Leo Academy · Year 4 English

Reading and viewing

7 questions and practical tasks · Victorian Curriculum English Version 2.0 · Level 4 · VC2E4LY07

Questions with a separate answer key and review guidance.

Circle one option for multiple-choice questions. Use the response spaces or extra paper for longer work.

Name: ________________________________   Date: __________________

Answers and review guidance

Open responses, handwriting and spoken tasks need adult review. The models are examples; different responses may meet the criteria.

Question 1

Answer: To introduce characters in a story for children.

Both introduce named rabbits as story characters, rather than giving animal-care facts.

Question 2

Answer: “Once upon a time”.

This familiar story-opening phrase places the narration in an unspecified story time.

Question 3

Answer: It begins by inviting the reader to meet Pip directly.

“Meet Pip” addresses the reader with an invitation; A begins with a statement about four rabbits.

Question 4

Answer: A question for the main character to investigate.

Pip wants to find out who nibbled the carrot tops. A only introduces the four names in the supplied sentence.

Question 5

Answer: A gives a list across several lines; B names one rabbit within its opening sentence.

This compares the visible arrangement of the two openings, not assumptions about their whole books.

Question 6

Answer: These openings share a purpose but use different introductions; two examples cannot represent every story from their times.

Comparing dated texts shows particular choices, but does not justify claims about all writers or readers in either period.

Question 7

Example response / review guidance: Both introduce rabbit characters for child readers. Potter uses a traditional opening and a displayed list of names. The new story directly introduces Pip and her mystery. These two choices cannot represent all stories from either date.

Other wording is acceptable when it is supported by the supplied text. Check the reasoning and evidence against the criteria.

Review criteria
  • Names the common purpose and audience.
  • Gives two supported differences.
  • Avoids generalising two extracts to all writing in either period.