Years 11–12 · Week 2 of 12

State Vectors and Normalisation

55 minutes 7 possible star points Mathematical Extension for Year 12

Learning goals

By the end, you can…

  • Use ket and column-vector notation for |0⟩, |1⟩ and a general qubit state.
  • Distinguish probability amplitudes from measurement probabilities.
  • Test and, when appropriate, normalise a two-entry real state vector.
  • Explain why global phase does not change measurement predictions.

What you already know

Connect to a familiar idea

A qubit state predicts measurement statistics. This lesson gives that state a precise vector form, beginning with real amplitudes before placing complex-number details in the extension.

  • Squares, square roots and Pythagoras' theorem
  • Two-entry column vectors
  • Classical probability

Opening story

Start with something familiar

A navigation arrow needs both horizontal and vertical components, but not every pair of numbers has unit length. A qubit state vector also has two components and must satisfy a length condition called normalisation.

Plain-English explanation

Build the idea carefully

Basis vectors and amplitudes

The computational-basis states are |0⟩ = [1, 0]ᵀ and |1⟩ = [0, 1]ᵀ. A pure qubit state is |ψ⟩ = α|0⟩ + β|1⟩ = [α, β]ᵀ, where α and β are probability amplitudes. For real amplitudes, normalisation requires α² + β² = 1. The computational-basis probabilities are then P(0) = α² and P(1) = β². Amplitudes may be negative even though probabilities cannot be negative.

Normalisation and global phase

Worked example: [3/5, 4/5]ᵀ is normalised because 9/25 + 16/25 = 1. It predicts probabilities 9/25 for 0 and 16/25 for 1. The vector [3, 4]ᵀ is not a valid normalised state until divided by its length 5. Multiplying every amplitude by the same phase factor does not change any physical prediction for the isolated state. In the real-amplitude examples, [α, β]ᵀ and [−α, −β]ᵀ differ only by global phase; relative signs, such as [α, β]ᵀ versus [α, −β]ᵀ, can matter.

Try the model

Amplitude and normalisation editor

Enter two real amplitudes or move the sliders. Check normalisation, normalise a non-zero vector, and compare amplitudes with probabilities.

Interactive teaching model

Ready. Adjust a control, then run the model.

What this model shows: This editor begins with real amplitudes. The Mathematical Extension adds complex amplitudes and phase.

Text alternative for this interactive

Text alternative: divide each entry of a non-zero vector by √(a² + b²). For [3, 4]ᵀ the length is 5, so the normalised entries are 3/5 and 4/5.

Expected observation: Normalising [3, 4]ᵀ produces [0.6, 0.8]ᵀ and predicted probabilities 0.36 and 0.64, which add to one.

Guided activity

Build and check three states

  1. Test [1, 0]ᵀ, [1/√2, 1/√2]ᵀ and [3, 4]ᵀ.
  2. Calculate each squared length before using the editor.
  3. Normalise any non-zero vector that fails the check.
  4. Record the resulting measurement probabilities and verify their total.

Evidence to collect: A table containing each original vector, its squared length, any normalised vector and non-negative probabilities whose total is one within rounding tolerance.

Glossary

Words to know

ket
A symbol such as |ψ⟩ used to denote a quantum state vector.
computational basis
The reference basis consisting of |0⟩ and |1⟩ for one qubit.
state vector
An ordered list of amplitudes representing a pure quantum state.
amplitude
A state-vector component whose squared magnitude contributes a probability.
normalisation
The condition that the total squared magnitude of a state vector equals one.
global phase
A common phase factor multiplying every amplitude, with no observable effect by itself.
relative phase
A phase difference between components that can affect interference.

Short recap

Keep these ideas

  • |0⟩ and |1⟩ form the computational basis for one qubit.
  • A valid pure-state vector has total squared magnitude one.
  • The vector [3/5, 4/5]ᵀ predicts probabilities 9/25 and 16/25.
  • Global phase does not alter predictions, but relative phase can alter later interference.

Knowledge check

7 clear questions

Choose an answer for immediate feedback. You may retry, and your best submitted score is kept.

1Which statement best answers this lesson's essential question?
2Which idea is supported by the explanation?
3Which result should you look for in the interactive model?
4Which statement correctly fixes the common misconception?
5Where does the helpful analogy stop being exact?
6What evidence should the guided activity collect?
7Which statement belongs in the lesson recap?
Mathematical Extension Optional extension for Year 12

For a complex number z = a + bi, define |z|² = a² + b². A general qubit obeys |α|² + |β|² = 1. Multiplying the whole state by e^(iγ) adds global phase, whereas a factor e^(iφ) on only one component changes relative phase.

Try this

Check that [1/√2, i/√2]ᵀ is normalised. Compare it with [1/√2, 1/√2]ᵀ in the computational basis, then predict why a later basis change can distinguish them.

Adult support Teacher and parent notes

Discuss

  • Why can an amplitude be negative while a probability cannot?
  • What operation turns [3, 4]ᵀ into a unit vector?
  • How is a relative minus sign different from multiplying the whole vector by −1?

Answer guidance

Students should square magnitudes, not raw complex values, and should state that the zero vector cannot be normalised.

Offline activity

Plot real amplitude pairs on coordinate paper. Mark the unit circle and connect each valid pair to its two computational-basis probabilities.

Safety

The activity is mathematical and simulation-based. Remind students that the coordinate picture represents states, not a qubit's physical path.

Open the full Quantum Computing Foundations adult guide

Sources and further reading

Checked references for this lesson

These sources support the lesson’s main scientific claims. Links open on the source organisation’s site.

  1. Quantum information IBM Quantum Learning · official learning module · checked 2026-08-02
  2. The qubit in quantum computing Microsoft Learn · official documentation · checked 2026-08-02
  3. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Cambridge University Press · textbook publisher page · checked 2026-08-02

Content review: Reviewed on 2026-08-02.